Jennifer's Body

[Cardinal]

So, has anyone seen it?

Basically, it's probably one of the worst movies ever made. However, it's meant to be that way, and it's pretty comical. I mean, there were maybe one or two parts that made me laugh out loud, but it was entertaining nonetheless.

Also you get to see Megan Fox making out with another girl.

Overall, I'd say it was worth the seven bucks to go see it. I wouldn't tell anyone that it's a must-see movie, but if you've got nothing else to do, then go for it. Keep in mind that it's not trying to be a serious movie, and you'll most likely enjoy it.

[Ivan Drago]

Originally Posted by Cardinal

So, has anyone seen it?

Basically, it's probably one of the worst movies ever made. However, it's meant to be that way, and it's pretty comical. I mean, there were maybe one or two parts that made me laugh out loud, but it was entertaining nonetheless.

Also you get to see Megan Fox making out with another girl.

Overall, I'd say it was worth the seven bucks to go see it. I wouldn't tell anyone that it's a must-see movie, but if you've got nothing else to do, then go for it. Keep in mind that it's not trying to be a serious movie, and you'll most likely enjoy it.

I'll get it on DVD... it looked terrible on the trailer, and the so-so reviews kind of cemented my feelings towards the movie.

[Cavalier!]

The escapist review on it basically shows my feelings on this movie. Megan Fox cannot be called an actor or Actress. I probably won't go see this movie if she 'acts' the same as she does in any of her other movies.

[Cardinal]

Originally Posted by Cavalier!

The escapist review on it basically shows my feelings on this movie. Megan Fox cannot be called an actor or Actress. I probably won't go see this movie if she 'acts' the same as she does in any of her other movies.

All the acting in the movie is intended to be bad.

[Crosshair?]

I saw an interview with the lead writer (who interestingly enough also penned "Juno") And she did say the movie was intended to be satirical and the acting to be awful...not really my cup of tea, but I'll probably Netflix it.

[Day Man]

Originally Posted by Crosshair?

I saw an interview with the lead writer (who interestingly enough also penned "Juno") And she did say the movie was intended to be satirical and the acting to be awful...not really my cup of tea, but I'll probably Netflix it.

Not saying your wrong, but why would anyone make a movie that is intended to be bad? And why would these people sign onto the movie knowing they only got the part because the director thinks they suck?

[Gloom-is-good]

Originally Posted by Day Man

Not saying your wrong, but why would anyone make a movie that is intended to be bad? And why would these people sign onto the movie knowing they only got the part because the director thinks they suck?

Aren't movies like Scary Movie 4 or Disaster Movie intended to be bad?

[Cardinal]

Originally Posted by Day Man

Not saying your wrong, but why would anyone make a movie that is intended to be bad? And why would these people sign onto the movie knowing they only got the part because the director thinks they suck?

Way to completely miss the point.

It's meant to be satirical. It's not meant to be a straight-up horror flick; It's meant to be a comedy, too. The acting just makes the movie better, to be honest. It's comical, and the dialogue is what you would hear coming from a stereotypical teenager (well, it's an EXTREME of what you'd be hearing from a stereotypical teen). It makes the movie funny, and makes you know that the movie's not taking itself seriously.

It's a good movie for what it is. It's not going to win awards, but it's something that will entertain you for almost two hours.